Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

https://nanoporetech.com/resource-centre/epi2me-16s-workflow-real-time-identification-bacteria-and-archaea

1a. Illumina vs Nanopore sequencing technologies

This overview is based on this excellent review article:

...

Functionally, the longer 3rd gen reads can counter the higher error rates through increased number of potential base matches. For 16S rRNA sequencing, short read Illumina sequences typically cover two 16S hypervariable regions, whereas Nanopore sequences the full 1.5 kilobase 16S sequences, which includes all nine hypervariable regions.

1b. Amplicon vs shotgun sequencing

This 2023 paper compared Illumina and Nanopore shotgun sequencing for identifying bacteria strains with little genomic variation between them. Both Illumina and Nanopore were able to correctly identify the bacteria strains, despite the higher error rate of the Nanopore sequences.

1c. Reference paper

Data used in this workshop is from a paper that compared Illumina and Nanopore 16S datasets.

...